日月光(ASE)某位工程师,离别感言, 这篇文章,造成公司不小的震撼, 还被副总约谈一番, 经过几番慰留,目前暂以留职停薪处理,完成学业再说!原文是英文,已附上翻译.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
I will end my job in ASE on 8/31 and then I will go to study?inNational Sun-Yan-San University.I want to appreciate many peoplein ASE during my working time.am glad to cooperate with you over two years.
我将在8/31结束我在日月光的工作，然後我将到中山大学读书。我要感谢很多在我於日月光工作期间帮助我的人。非常高兴能与你们合作超过两年的时光。
I entered ASE on 2000/3/13. It's nearly my first job (my firstjob existed only one month) after I graduated from army, and I
learned> many things during two years. There are many advantages inthis company.
我在2000/3/13进到日月光，这几乎是我自陆军退伍後的第一份工作(我的第一份工作仅做了一个月)，在这两年当中，我学到很多事情。
First, the hierarchy in ASE is not very obvious. The distinctnessamong manager, staff member and clerk is latent and working atmospherein ASE is approximatelyharmonious.That's the reason why I can stayhere over two years.
第一，日月光的阶级意识不是非常明显，经理、职员和助理之间的差异是潜在的’b日月光的工作气氛大致上是很和谐的，这也是我为什麽能在此超过两年的原因。
Second, semiconductor industry is a global competitive environment.Working in ASE can help me to extend my vision about world environment.Working in ASE can help me to extend my vision about world because I have many opportunities to work with people from many countries.
English ability improvement is the largest income for me in my careerlife. This experience can help me to compete with other people in this globalize competitive market in the future. Working in IC assembly
industry can study about knowledge of all the semiconductor supply chain from wafer fabrication to SMT.
It's a good way to involve into electronic engineering for
mechanical background engineers.
第二，半导体产业是全球竞争性的环境，在日月光工作可以帮助扩展自己对
世界的视野，因为可以有机会跟来自不同国家的人工作。英文能力的提应该是我
在日月光工作的最大收。这工作的经验可以帮助我在未来全球化的竞争市场上与他
人竞争。
在封装产业工作可以学习到整个半导体供应链的知识，从晶圆造到上板，
对於机械工程背景的工程师而言，这是切入电子工程的一个捷径。
Third, I studied mechanical engineering in university and in
graduated school; working experience let me know about that other subject is
also important for an engineer. I didn't like chemistry in school, but
we have many chemical materials here and engineers need to have
knowledge about materials.This let me understand what's application of
knowledge in school and I also try to learn many things about semiconductor
by myself after work. These are my incomes in ASE during these two years.
第三，我在大学和研究所学的是机械工程，工作上的经验使我了解其它的科
目对一位工程师是同样重要的。我在学校不喜欢化学，但是我们在这用到很多化学
的材料，工程师需要有材料的相关知识，这使我了解学校学的知识有何应用，同时我
在上班时候还自修很多半导体的相关知识。这些都是我在日月光两年的收。
Working in a large company can also let me know about what other
department doing in an enterprise like human resource, producing
management,inventory, and many things. ASE is an institutional company.
Maybe someone doesn't think so.?But if we compare with some other
companies, ASE is really more institutional in many departments.
在大公司工作也可让我知道在一间企业其它部门的功能，像是人资、生产管
理、仓储管理和很多的事情，日月光是间有制度的公司，也许有人不认为如此，
如果跟某些其它公司来说，日月光的确在很多部门还是比较有制度的。
However, I also have some suggestions and complaints about ASE.?
The definition of position of process engineer is not very clear.
After worked here over two years, I am still not sure what's the
difference among process engineer, R&D engineer and QA engineer.?
People in production line also don't know about this point.?So there are
many tedious things need process engineer to do.
然而，我也有一些对日月光的建议和抱怨。程工程师职务的定义不是很明确，
在工作两年之後，我还是不太确定，到底程、研发和品管工程师的差异在哪里。
生产线的人同样也不清楚这一点，所以有很多繁杂之事都要程工程师去处理。
Most things I handled in my first year in ASE are excursive events
happened in production line. I always answer phone from production
line,"There is a wetting not enough case, and what should we do" What
can I do?? The solution is to reject or to waive.?Isn't it the job of
QA engineer?
Why don't people in production call QA engineer to argue the waived
criteria with QA engineer? Why I must waive the products for production
line? Why don't people in production line be responsible for their fault?
Most of my time in first year is to sign "Hold and Release notice" day
after day.Isn't it the job of supervisor in production line?
在我在日月光的第一年，大部份时间都是处理生产线发生的异常。我常接到从生产
线打来的电话说：「有一批货有出水不良，我们要怎麽办？」我能怎麽办？不是退货
就是放宽规格。这不是QA工程师该做的吗？为什麽生产线不自己去找QA工程师谈放宽
的规格？为什麽我必须替生产线放宽产品规格？为什麽生产线的人不能替自己造成的
问题负责？在我第一年的大部份时间就是日复一日地签停止放行单，这不是生产线主
任就可以做的工作吗？
I supposed job of process engineer is similar with R&D
engineer,but besides new process and material phased in, we also have to handle
all the tedious and trouble things happened in production line. They
are like they can't find travel cards, lead-frames are not enough, they
set up by wrong parameters, and they don't know where the products shipped.
Most of our energy is be exhausted by these boring and routine things
happened in production line. I don't think that process engineer still have
interesting to learn about new invention in assembly technology after
twisted by these tedious things. Therefore when we really meat large trouble
from customer complaint, we don't know how to solve it.
It's like n-VIDIA case, and we lost a large customer. Engineers
are exhausted by so many little tedious things and then they don't
have enough ability to solve real excursion needs engineers to handle.
We can even say it's lack of professional ability. In my opinion, an
engineer should be trained to have ability to solve big trouble, not the chicke
n feathers and garlic skins. On the other hand, an engineer's ability
should be based on knowledge of materials, process, and equipment but
doesn't on tedious administration procedure.
我假设程工程师的工作是类似研发工程师，但是除了新程和新材料的导
入之外，我们还必须处理所有生产线发生的杂务和麻烦。像是一些他们找不到路
单、钉架不够用、他们设错数、他们不知道产品该出货到哪里。我们工程师大部份
的精力就耗在这些发生在生产线上无聊又重覆的事情。
在被这些杂事纠缠之後，我不认为程工程师还会有兴趣去学习封装技术的相关新知。
因此，当我们真正遇到来自客户抱怨的重大异常时，我们反而不知该如何解决，
如同n-Vidia的个案，我们因此失去了一个大客户。工程师被太多细小琐事缠身，然
後他们没有能力解决真正需要工程师处理的异常，我们甚至可以说是专业能力不足?
我认为，一位工程师应该被训练有能力处理大麻烦，而不是一些鸡毛蒜皮的小事。
换句话说，工程师的能力应该以对材料、程、设备的知识为基础，而不是在
处理繁杂行政程序上。
Peter Drucker proposed that enterprise must reduce tedious things
for knowledge worker whose contribution is not handling these routine
things.
Does ASE consider engineer be a knowledge worker? When we phased in a
new material, most we can do is to try and error. We try to use
different materials and processes and to compare them by reliability result.
We always do experiment blindly from customer's request. Many
engineer don't have enough knowledge background to convince customer it's
unnecessary to do it because engineers don't have enough time to study.?These
boring excursive events only exhaust them and engineers don't grow up intheir
knowledge.When they notice about this, the only thing they can do is to change
a new way in their career life.
If we really hope that engineers can extend their knowledge
during working,we should train people in production line to handle something
independently.At least, I don't consider to sign "hold and release notice" or t
o change the defect code to die discrepancy code or to account how many
dies lost during process or to bind working instructions on travel cards
can help engineers to extend their knowledge.?
I think that company provides 30000 one month to an engineer also
doesn't want he only to handle this kind of things.
彼得杜拉克认为企业应该减少知识工作者的杂务，因为他们对公司的贡献不在於处
理这些琐事。日月光是否视工程师为知识工作者呢？当我们导入新材料时，我们最常
做的就尝试错误。我们试着用不同的材料和程比较它们可靠度的结果。我们总是盲
目地做着客户要求的实验，很多工程师并没有足够的知识背景说服客户这是不需要做
的，因为他们并没有足够的时间去学习。工程师不断地虚耗在一些琐事上面，又无
法在知识上有成长。
当他们发现到这一点时，他们唯一能做的就是另外在他们职业生涯中找新的出路。
如果我们真的希望工程师们能在工作中拓展知识，我们应该训练生产线的人独立处理某些事
。
至少，我不认为 签"暂停放行单"或是将缺点码调成晶粒差异或是h数
程中损失多少颗晶粒还是将作业指示钉在