|
注意:需要资料的网友请直接到http://www.ECNdesign.com 开发团队网下载就可以。
Antenna basics
射频方法与案例 http://rfcc.bokee.com/
VSWR
VSWR is a measure of impedance mismatch between the transmission line and its load. The higher the VSWR, the greater the mismatch. The minimum VSWR, i.e., that which corresponds to a perfect impedance match, is unity.
To understand the definition above we must understand what impedance is. Impedance in antenna terms refers to the ratio of the voltage to current (both are present on an antenna) at any particular point of the antenna. This ratio of voltage to current varies on different parts of the antenna, which means that the impedance is different on different spots on the antenna if you could pick any spot and measure it.
As stated before, the impedance for the entire chain from the radio to the antenna must be the same, and almost all radio equipment is built for an impedance of 50 ohm.
If any part of this chain fails to show a 50 ohm impedance due to e.g. bad connections, incorrect antenna length, etc., the maximum power will not be radiated from the antenna. Instead part (or all) of the wave is reflected back down the line. The amount of the wave reflected back depends on how bad the mismatch is.
The combination of the original wave traveling down the coaxial cable (towards the antenna or opposite during receive) and the reflecting wave is called a standing wave. The ratio of the two above described waves is known as the Standing Wave Ratio.
The result is presented as a figure describing the power absorption of the antenna. A value of 2.0:1 VSWR, which is equal to 90 % power absorption, is considered very good for a small antenna: 3.0:1 is considered acceptable (-6dB) which is equal to 75 % power absorption.
Smith Chart
One common way of visualizing the VSWR is a polar plot called Smith chart. From this plot the VSWR value, the return loss and the impedance for the different frequencies can be derived. Therefore it is an important instrument for understanding antennas. To learn more about the SMITH chart, see e.g. http://sss-mag.com/smith.html
Retrun Loss
This is basically the same thing as VSWR.
If 50 % of the signal is absorbed by the antenna and 50 % is reflected back, we say that the Return Loss is -3dB. A very good antenna might have a value of -10dB (90 % absorbed & 10 % reflected).
When studying a graph showing Return Loss/VSWR, a deep and wide dip of the curve is good since this shows an antenna with good bandwidth (spreadband). Consequently, the narrower the dip is, the bigger risk that also desired channels will be reflected away (narrow band).
Return Loss Chart

Note: To be able to compare figures from different manufacturers, you must be aware of the conditions under which the measurement was made. Was impedance matching used or not?
Conversion table VSWR / Return Loss
|
Performance |
VSWR |
Return Loss (dB) |
|
|
1.01 |
-46.1 |
|
Better |
1.05 |
-32.3 |
|
|
1.1 |
-26.4 |
|
|
1.2 |
-20.8 |
|
|
1.3 |
-17.7 |
|
|
1.4 |
-15.6 |
|
|
1.5 |
14.0 |
|
|
1.75 |
-11.3 |
|
|
2.0 |
-9.5 |
|
|
2.5 |
-7.4 |
|
|
3.01 |
-6.0 |
|
|
5.85 |
-3.0 |
|
Worse |
8.72 |
-2.0 |
|
|
17.4 |
-1.0 |
Bandwidth
Normally a radio needs to work on multiple frequencies. For example, the 2.4 GHz ISM band used by Bluetooth/Wi-Fi/Zigbee/WiMedia devices has a range from 2400-2483 MHz. In this band PAN communication uses 78 channels for its frequency hopping technique, 1 MHz between each channel.
This means that the antenna must perform well over a range of frequencies. So, the goal must be to make it resonant in the middle of that band. The term that is important here is bandwidth or how much band your antenna works well over. One method of judging how well (efficiently) your antenna is working is by measuring VSWR.
Typically, bandwidth is measured by looking at SWR, i.e., by finding the frequency range over which the SWR is less than 2.

Efficiency
Efficiency is a figure showing the ratio of the total radiated power to the total input power . Efficiency has no unit and the ideal figure is 1.
Efficiency =radiated power /input power
It is essential to know how the measurement was performed before comparing figures from different manufacturers: was a matching network used? Was the measuring point as close to the antenna as possible or was the transmission line included? Often, the figure for efficiency will dramatically decrease when the antenna is built into a device.
Note: This is a good figure of merit, especially for small antennas.
Efficiency
Gain & 3D Pattern
Antenna gain is a measure of directivity. In order to explain this better, we must first have a look at the different antenna types and their radiation patterns.
Basically there are only two types of antennas: The dipole antenna (Hertzian) and the vertical antenna (Marconi). All antennas can be broken down to one of these types (although some say that there is only one - the dipole). In addition to this we have a theoretical perfect antenna (non-existent) that radiates equally in all directions with 100% efficiency. This antenna is called an isotropic radiator.
Basic Antenna types Antenna Radiation Patterns
This is similar to gain but the heat losses (i.e. the efficiency) are disregarded. We will then get a pattern as the dotted line shown in the figure. Point "d" refers to directivity,point "a" to gain and point "b" to the isotropic reference.
Gain presented as 3D gain

The gain can also be presented as a 3D gain. The radius of the spheriod is proportional to the antenna gain.
Gain in theory Since all real antennas will radiate more in some directions than in others, you can say that gain is the amount of power you can reach in one direction at the expense of the power lost in the others. When talking about gain it is always the main lobe that is discussed.
Gain may be expressed as dBi or dBd. The first is gain compared to the isotropic radiator and the second gain is compared to a half-wave dipole in free space (0 dBd="2".15 dBi).
It may be worthwhile considering the fact that instead of doubling your amplifier output, you could alternatively use an antenna that has 3db more gain than your current antenna and achieve exactly the same effect.
Note: Small antennas usually have low gain, often between 0 and 2dBi.
Note: Regarding efficiency and radiation patterns - what is true for transmission is generall also true for reception.
Directivity
This is similar to gain but the heat losses (i.e. the efficienc |